When was the last time you saw an autistic character on TV or in a movie who felt authentic? Really think about it. Did they remind you of someone you know, or did they fall into one of the tired tropes we’ve seen recycled for decades?
Autism representation in media has made strides, but it’s still riddled with stereotypes, inaccuracies, and a glaring lack of diversity. These portrayals shape public perception of autism, influencing how autistic people are treated and understood—or misunderstood—in real life. Let’s break down what’s still going wrong, what needs to change, and how we can push for better representation.
The Problems With Autism Representation
1. Persistent Stereotypes
Autism is often represented in the form of a white, male genius—a socially clueless savant who is brilliant in one specific area but completely inept in others. Think of characters like Raymond in Rain Man or Sheldon in The Big Bang Theory. While these portrayals have brought autism into public consciousness, they barely scratch the surface of the spectrum.
What about autistic women, people of color, or nonbinary individuals? What about autistic characters who aren’t math prodigies or computer geniuses? By fixating on one narrow archetype, media reinforces the idea that autism looks one way, erasing the experiences of countless individuals.
2. Lack of Authenticity
Too often, autistic characters are written by neurotypical creators who lack firsthand experience or consultation. The result? Flat, one-dimensional portrayals that feel more like caricatures than real people. These characters might flap their hands or avoid eye contact, but their internal worlds are rarely explored with nuance or depth.
Take the show Atypical, for instance. While it received praise for centering an autistic character, critics and viewers pointed out that its portrayal leaned heavily on surface-level traits, failing to reflect the complexity of autism. It wasn’t until later seasons that autistic actors and consultants were brought on, leading to a noticeable improvement.
3. The Problem of Inspiration Porn
“Inspiration porn” refers to stories that use disabled characters to make neurotypical audiences feel good about themselves. Many autism narratives fall into this trap, framing autism as a tragedy that’s either “overcome” or serves as a lesson for neurotypical characters.
Take Music, the controversial film directed by Sia, which faced backlash for its stereotypical depiction of an autistic girl and its framing of her as a tool for the personal growth of the neurotypical protagonist. Critics slammed the film for perpetuating harmful tropes and failing to consult autistic people in its production.
What Authentic Representation Looks Like
So, what would good autism representation actually look like?
1. Diverse Stories
Autism is a spectrum, and its representation should reflect that. We need stories about autistic women navigating masking, Black autistic characters dealing with systemic biases, nonbinary autistic characters exploring their identity, and more.
A great example is Julia, the autistic Muppet on Sesame Street. Her portrayal, created with input from autism advocacy organizations and families, shows a young girl who expresses herself differently but is accepted and loved for who she is.
2. Genuine Consultation
Representation starts with inclusion. Creators should work with autistic writers, actors, and consultants throughout the creative process. Shows like Everything’s Gonna Be Okay have been praised for featuring autistic actors in autistic roles and for addressing complex topics like relationships, sensory needs, and identity with humor and sensitivity.
3. Complex, Multi-Dimensional Characters
Autistic characters should be more than their diagnosis. They should have personalities, flaws, relationships, and goals—just like anyone else. A standout example is Matilda from Everything’s Gonna Be Okay, who is portrayed as ambitious, witty, and fiercely independent. Her autism is a part of her, but it doesn’t define her entire character.
Why Representation Matters
Representation isn’t just about seeing yourself on screen—it’s about challenging stereotypes, fostering empathy, and creating a more inclusive world. When media portrays autism accurately, it helps neurotypical audiences understand the spectrum’s diversity and complexity. It also gives autistic viewers a sense of belonging and visibility, showing them they’re not alone.
As Harper Lee wrote in To Kill a Mockingbird: “You never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view.” Authentic representation does exactly that—it invites audiences to step into someone else’s shoes and see the world through their eyes.
How We Push for Better Representation
- Demand Authenticity: Support media that involves autistic creators and consultants. Boycott productions that perpetuate harmful stereotypes.
- Celebrate Positive Examples: Amplify shows, movies, and books that get it right. Talk about why they matter and how they set a standard.
- Advocate for Change: Use your voice on social media, write reviews, and engage with creators to push for better representation.
Final Thoughts
Autism representation in media has come a long way, but it still has miles to go. By pushing for diversity, authenticity, and complexity, we can ensure that autistic characters aren’t just tokens or tropes—they’re people, with all the richness and depth that implies.
What’s your take on autism representation in media? Let’s discuss in the comments—I’d love to hear your thoughts.
Resources for Further Reading: